8 ideas
10528 | Definitions concern how we should speak, not how things are [Fine,K] |
9935 | Mathematical truth is always compromising between ordinary language and sensible epistemology [Benacerraf] |
10529 | If Hume's Principle can define numbers, we needn't worry about its truth [Fine,K] |
10530 | Hume's Principle is either adequate for number but fails to define properly, or vice versa [Fine,K] |
17927 | Realists have semantics without epistemology, anti-realists epistemology but bad semantics [Benacerraf, by Colyvan] |
9936 | The platonist view of mathematics doesn't fit our epistemology very well [Benacerraf] |
12185 | Logical necessity is epistemic necessity, which is the old notion of a priori [Edgington, by McFetridge] |
10527 | An abstraction principle should not 'inflate', producing more abstractions than objects [Fine,K] |