Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'Semantic Necessity', 'Philosophy and Scientific Image of Man' and 'Fallibilism'

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts

---

11 ideas

1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / c. Philosophy as generalisation

21829

Philosophy aims to understand how things (broadly understood) hang together (broadly understood) [Sellars]

5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 8. Theories in Logic

14620

Theories in logic are sentences closed under consequence, but in truth discussions theories have axioms [Fine,K]

7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 2. Reduction

6550	Reduction requires that an object's properties consist of its constituents' properties and relations [Sellars]

10. Modality / C. Sources of Modality / 1. Sources of Necessity

14530

The role of semantic necessity in semantics is like metaphysical necessity in metaphysics [Fine,K, by Hale/Hoffmann,A]

11. Knowledge Aims / B. Certain Knowledge / 3. Fallibilism

19701

Fallibilism is consistent with dogmatism or scepticism, and is not alternative to them [Dougherty]

19700

It is best to see the fallibility in the reasons, rather than in the agents or the knowledge [Dougherty]

19702

We can't normally say that we know something 'but it might be false' [Dougherty]

19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 2. Semantics

14618

Semantics is either an assignment of semantic values, or a theory of truth [Fine,K]

14621

Semantics is a body of semantic requirements, not semantic truths or assigned values [Fine,K]

19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 7. Extensional Semantics

14622

Referential semantics (unlike Fregeanism) allows objects themselves in to semantic requirements [Fine,K]

19. Language / E. Analyticity / 4. Analytic/Synthetic Critique

14619

The Quinean doubt: are semantics and facts separate, and do analytic sentences have no factual part? [Fine,K]