13 ideas
10735 | Abstraction from objects won't reveal an operation's being performed 'so many times' [Geach] |
9169 | A statement can be metaphysically necessary and epistemologically contingent [Putnam] |
5819 | Conceivability is no proof of possibility [Putnam] |
10732 | If concepts are just recognitional, then general judgements would be impossible [Geach] |
9168 | I can't distinguish elm trees, but I mean by 'elm' the same set of trees as everybody else [Putnam] |
5820 | 'Water' has an unnoticed indexical component, referring to stuff around here [Putnam] |
10731 | For abstractionists, concepts are capacities to recognise recurrent features of the world [Geach] |
10733 | The abstractionist cannot explain 'some' and 'not' [Geach] |
10734 | Only a judgement can distinguish 'striking' from 'being struck' [Geach] |
9170 | We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference [Putnam] |
5817 | Language is more like a cooperative steamship than an individual hammer [Putnam] |
19436 | Bare or primary matter is passive; it is clothed or secondary matter which contains action [Leibniz] |
5818 | If water is H2O in the actual world, there is no possible world where it isn't H2O [Putnam] |