12 ideas
7332 | There is a huge range of sentences of which we do not know the logical form [Davidson] |
19271 | No rule can be fully explained [Kripke] |
19269 | 'Quus' means the same as 'plus' if the ingredients are less than 57; otherwise it just produces 5 [Kripke] |
7305 | Kripke's Wittgenstein says meaning 'vanishes into thin air' [Kripke, by Miller,A] |
19270 | If you ask what is in your mind for following the addition rule, meaning just seems to vanish [Kripke] |
7772 | Compositionality explains how long sentences work, and truth conditions are the main compositional feature [Davidson, by Lycan] |
7327 | Davidson thinks Frege lacks an account of how words create sentence-meaning [Davidson, by Miller,A] |
11076 | Community implies assertability-conditions rather than truth-conditions semantics [Kripke, by Hanna] |
7769 | You can state truth-conditions for "I am sick now" by relativising it to a speaker at a time [Davidson, by Lycan] |
11075 | The sceptical rule-following paradox is the basis of the private language argument [Kripke, by Hanna] |
6179 | Should we assume translation to define truth, or the other way around? [Blackburn on Davidson] |
6017 | Nomos is king [Pindar] |