5 ideas
9560 | S5 provides the correct logic for necessity in the broadly logical sense [Fine,K] |
4242 | Pure supervenience explains nothing, and is a sign of something fundamental we don't know [Nagel] |
19701 | Fallibilism is consistent with dogmatism or scepticism, and is not alternative to them [Dougherty] |
19700 | It is best to see the fallibility in the reasons, rather than in the agents or the knowledge [Dougherty] |
19702 | We can't normally say that we know something 'but it might be false' [Dougherty] |