6 ideas
18170 | The Axiom of Reducibility is self-effacing: if true, it isn't needed [Quine] |
19393 | What is not active is nothing [Leibniz] |
19722 | We could know the evidence for our belief without knowing why it is such evidence [Mittag] |
19723 | Evidentialism can't explain that we accept knowledge claims if the evidence is forgotten [Mittag] |
19720 | Evidentialism concerns the evidence for the proposition, not for someone to believe it [Mittag] |
19721 | Coherence theories struggle with the role of experience [Mittag] |