7 ideas
6564 | To affirm 'p and not-p' is to have mislearned 'and' or 'not' [Quine] |
7746 | We don't normally think of names as having senses (e.g. we don't give definitions of them) [Searle] |
7747 | How can a proper name be correlated with its object if it hasn't got a sense? [Searle] |
7748 | 'Aristotle' means more than just 'an object that was christened "Aristotle"' [Searle] |
7749 | Reference for proper names presupposes a set of uniquely referring descriptions [Searle] |
7750 | Proper names are logically connected with their characteristics, in a loose way [Searle] |
15540 | You can't deny temporary intrinsic properties by saying the properties are relations (to times) [Lewis] |