Combining Texts

All the ideas for 'A Problem about Substitutional Quantification?st1=Saul A. Kripke', 'Chomsky on himself' and 'The Essence of Reference'

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these texts

---

8 ideas

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / e. Empty names

10429

It is best to say that a name designates iff there is something for it to designate [Sainsbury]

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 2. Descriptions / b. Definite descriptions

10425

Definite descriptions may not be referring expressions, since they can fail to refer [Sainsbury]

10438

Definite descriptions are usually rigid in subject, but not in predicate, position [Sainsbury]

5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 4. Substitutional Quantification

10792

The substitutional quantifier is not in competition with the standard interpretation [Kripke, by Marcus (Barcan)]

18. Thought / D. Concepts / 2. Origin of Concepts / c. Nativist concepts

6649	Chomsky now says concepts are basically innate, as well as syntax [Chomsky, by Lowe]

19. Language / B. Reference / 3. Direct Reference / b. Causal reference

10432

A new usage of a name could arise from a mistaken baptism of nothing [Sainsbury]

19. Language / B. Reference / 5. Speaker's Reference

10434

Even a quantifier like 'someone' can be used referentially [Sainsbury]

26. Natural Theory / A. Speculations on Nature / 3. Natural Function

10431

Things are thought to have a function, even when they can't perform them [Sainsbury]