Full Idea
Necessity does not properly apply to the fulfilment of conditions by objects (such as the number which numbers the planets), apart from special ways of specifying them.
Gist of Idea
Necessity only applies to objects if they are distinctively specified
Source
Willard Quine (Reference and Modality [1953], §3)
Book Reference
Quine,Willard: 'From a Logical Point of View' [Harper and Row 1963], p.151
A Reaction
This appears to say that the only necessity is 'de dicto', and that there is no such thing as 'de re' necessity (of the thing in itself). How can Quine deny that there might be de re necessities? His point is epistemological - how can we know them?