Full Idea
Some relevant logics reject transitivity, but we defend the classical view.
Gist of Idea
Relevant logic may reject transitivity
Source
JC Beall / G Restall (Logical Pluralism [2006], 8)
Book Reference
Beall,J/Restall,G: 'Logical Pluralism' [OUP 2006], p.91
A Reaction
[they cite Neil Tennant for this view] To reject transitivity (A?B ? B?C ? A?C) certainly seems a long way from classical logic. But in everyday inference Tennant's idea seems good. The first premise may be irrelevant to the final conclusion.