Full Idea
Fine says a truth is necessary when it is a logical consequence of the essential truths, but maybe it is a consequence of the essential truths together with the basic grounding laws (the 'Moorean connections').
Gist of Idea
Are necessary truths rooted in essences, or also in basic grounding laws?
Source
Gideon Rosen (Metaphysical Dependence [2010], 13)
Book Reference
'Modality', ed/tr. Hale,B/Hoffman,A [OUP 2010], p.133
A Reaction
I'm with Fine all the way here, as we really don't need to clog nature up with things called 'grounding laws', which are both obscure and inexplicable. Fine's story is the one for naturalistically inclined philosophers.