Full Idea
Is there any reason to suppose that 'being identical with Socrates' names a property? Well, is there any reason to suppose that it does not? I cannot think of any, nor have I heard any that are at all impressive.
Gist of Idea
Does 'being identical with Socrates' name a property? I can think of no objections to it
Source
Alvin Plantinga (World and Essence [1970], II)
Book Reference
Plantinga,Alvin: 'Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality' [OUP 2003], p.58
A Reaction
Is there any reason to think that a planet somewhere is entirely under the control of white mice? Extraordinary. No wonder Plantinga believes in God and the Ontological Argument, as well as the existence of 'Socrateity' etc.