Full Idea
The dependence of {Socrates} on Socrates appears to involve a set and a philosopher, neither of which is a fact.
Gist of Idea
The dependence of {Socrates} on Socrates involves a set and a philosopher, not facts
Source
David Liggins (Truth-makers and dependence [2012], 10.6)
Book Reference
'Metaphysical Grounding', ed/tr. Correia,F/Schnieder,B [CUP 2012], p.266
A Reaction
He points out that defenders of facts as the basis of dependence could find a suitable factual paraphrase here. Socrates is just Socrates, but the singleton has to be understood in a particular way to generate the dependence.