Full Idea
Indeterminacy arguments aim to show that if there is any way to make a theory true, then there are many ways to do so.
Gist of Idea
Indeterminacy arguments say if a theory can be made true, it has multiple versions
Source
Tim Button (The Limits of Reason [2013], 02.1)
Book Reference
Button,Tim: 'The Limits of Realism' [OUP 2013], p.14
A Reaction
Button says the simplest indeterminacy argument is Putnam's Permutation Argument - that you can shuffle the objects in a formal model, without affecting truth. But do we belief that metaphysics can be settled in this sort of way?