Full Idea
What's peculiar about the analytic is that denying it seem unintelligible. Far from unrevisability explaining analyticity, it seems to be analyticitiy that explains unrevisability; we only balk at denying unmarried bachelors because that's what it means!
Gist of Idea
Analytic statements are undeniable (because of meaning), rather than unrevisable
Source
Georges Rey (The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction [2013], 3.7)
Book Reference
'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.9
A Reaction
This is a criticism of Quine, who attacked analyticity when it is understood as unrevisability. Obviously we could revise the concept of 'bachelor', if our marriage customs changed a lot. Rey seems right here.
Related Idea
Idea 11170 Analytic truth may only be true in virtue of the meanings of certain terms [Fine,K]