Full Idea
In the modern definition, a 'logical truth' is true under every interpretation of the non-logical words it contains.
Gist of Idea
Modern logical truths are true under all interpretations of the non-logical words
Source
Michael Potter (The Rise of Analytic Philosophy 1879-1930 [2020], 19 'Frege's')
Book Reference
Potter,Michael: 'The Rise of Anaytic Philosophy 1879-1930' [Routledge 2020], p.131
A Reaction
What if the non-logical words are nonsense, or are used inconsistently ('good'), or ambiguously ('bank'), or vaguely ('bald'), or with unsure reference ('the greatest philosopher' becomes 'Bentham')? What qualifies as an 'interpretation'?