Full Idea
There is nothing to support the thesis that wide content is the only kind of content, or that it is any way pre-eminent or basic.
Clarification
'Wide' content is meaning which depends on how the world is, not on a mental state
Gist of Idea
Nothing shows that all content is 'wide', or that wide content has logical priority
Source
David Lewis (Lewis: reduction of mind (on himself) [1994], p.424)
Book Reference
'A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind', ed/tr. Guttenplan,Samuel [Blackwell 1995], p.424
A Reaction
The idea that all content is 'wide' seems quite wrong. We can't all be wrong about the meaning of a word, because the underlying facts have not yet been discovered.