Full Idea
Critics say an analyst is obliged by his atomistic metaphysics to regard an object consisting of parts a, b, c and d in a distinctive configuration as being simply a+b+c+d, and thus giving an entirely false account of its nature.
Gist of Idea
Critics say analysis can only show the parts, and not their distinctive configuration
Source
A.J. Ayer (Language,Truth and Logic [1936], Ch.2)
Book Reference
Ayer,A.J.: 'Language, Truth and Logic' [Penguin 1974], p.75
A Reaction
Ayer refers the critics to gestatl psychology. Personally I prefer to talk about the ontology rather than the psychology. If we include (as Russell suggests) relations as part of the analysis, there seems to be no problem.