Full Idea
My beliefs could be well justified in coherentist terms, while not accurately representing the world, and my system of beliefs could be completely free-floating.
Gist of Idea
My justifications might be very coherent, but totally unconnected to the world
Source
Cardinal/Hayward/Jones (Epistemology [2004], Ch.3)
Book Reference
Cardinal/Hayward/Jones: 'Epistemology: the theory of knowledge' [John Murray 2004], p.79
A Reaction
This nicely encapsulates to correspondence objection to coherence theory. One thing missing from the coherence account is that beliefs aren't chosen for their coherence, but are mostly unthinkingly triggered by experiences.