20344
|
Music is not an expressive art, because it expresses no familiar emotions
[Hanslick, by Wollheim]
|
|
Full Idea:
Hanslick concluded from the fact that music doesn't express definite feelings like piety, love, joy, or sadness, that it isn't an art of expression.
|
|
From:
report of Eduard Hanslick (The Beautiful in Music [1854]) by Richard Wollheim - Art and Its Objects 48
|
|
A reaction:
Whether music is 'expressive' (which it may not be) should not be confused with whether it is emotional, which it clearly is, even in its coolest examples. Hanslick viewed music as a code, not a language.
|
8123
|
The purpose of art is to help mankind to evolve better, more socially beneficial feelings
[Tolstoy]
|
|
Full Idea:
The evolution of feeling proceeds by means of art - feelings less kind and less necessary for the well-being of mankind being replaced by others kinder and more needful for that end. That is the purpose of art.
|
|
From:
Leo Tolstoy (What is Art? [1898], Ch.16)
|
|
A reaction:
Underneath his superficially expressivist view of art, Tolstoy is really an old-fashioned moralist about it, like Dr Johnson. This is the moralism of the great age of the nineteenth century novel (which was, er, the greatest age of the novel!).
|
23926
|
Art is distinguished by its aesthetic emotion, which produces appropriate form
[Bell,C]
|
|
Full Idea:
The characteristic of a work of art is its power of provoking aesthetic emotion; the expression of emotion is what gives it its power. ...Rightness of form is invariably a consequence of rightness of emotion.
|
|
From:
Clive Bell (Art [1913], I.III)
|
|
A reaction:
Bell doesn't dig very deep, because the obvious next question, not really addressed, is what makes the emotion 'right'. He suggests that significant form reveals reality, but why would an emotion do that? Does each work have a distinct emotion?
|