structure for 'Theory of Logic'    |     alphabetical list of themes    |     expand these ideas

5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 2. Descriptions / c. Theory of definite descriptions

[rewriting of descriptive terms to show underlying logic]

25 ideas
The theory of definite descriptions reduces the definite article 'the' to the concepts of predicate logic [Russell, by Horwich]
Russell implies that 'the baby is crying' is only true if the baby is unique [Grayling on Russell]
Russell explained descriptions with quantifiers, where Frege treated them as names [Russell, by McCullogh]
Russell avoids non-existent objects by denying that definite descriptions are proper names [Russell, by Miller,A]
Denying definite description sentences are subject-predicate in form blocks two big problems [Russell, by Forbes,G]
Russell says apparent referring expressions are really assertions about properties [Russell, by Cooper,DE]
The theory of descriptions lacks conventions for the scope of quantifiers [Lackey on Russell]
Non-count descriptions don't threaten Russell's theory, which is only about singulars [Laycock on Russell]
Denoting is crucial in Russell's account of mathematics, for identifying classes [Russell, by Monk]
Russell's analysis means molecular sentences are ambiguous over the scope of the description [Kaplan on Russell]
The theory of descriptions eliminates the name of the entity whose existence was presupposed [Russell, by Quine]
Russell's theory must be wrong if it says all statements about non-existents are false [Read on Russell]
Russell's theory explains non-existents, negative existentials, identity problems, and substitutivity [Russell, by Lycan]
Russell showed how to define 'the', and thereby reduce the ontology of logic [Russell, by Lackey]
Names can be converted to descriptions, and Russell showed how to eliminate those [Quine]
'The present King of France is bald' presupposes existence, rather than stating it [Strawson,P, by Grayling]
Russell asks when 'The King of France is wise' would be a true assertion [Strawson,P]
If 'Queen of England' does not refer if there is no queen, its meaning can't refer if there is one [Cooper,DE]
For Russell, expressions dependent on contingent circumstances must be eliminated [Kaplan]
Names do not have scope problems (e.g. in placing negation), but Russell's account does have that problem [Bostock]
Recognising the definite description 'the man' as a quantifier phrase, not a singular term, is a real insight [Soames]
The theory of descriptions supports internalism, since they are thinkable when the object is non-existent [Crane]
On Russell's analysis, the sentence "The winged horse has wings" comes out as false [Jacquette]
Definite descriptions theory eliminates the King of France, but not the Queen of England [Linsky,B]
Definites descriptions don't solve the empty names problem, because the properties may not exist [Sawyer]