5548
|
Hume became a total sceptic, because he believed that reason was a deception
[Hume, by Kant]
|
|
Full Idea:
David Hume gave way entirely to scepticism, since he believed himself to have discovered in what is generally held to be reason a deception of our faculty of cognition.
|
|
From:
report of David Hume (Treatise of Human Nature [1739]) by Immanuel Kant - Critique of Pure Reason B128
|
|
A reaction:
Unfair to Hume, who was very opposed to global scepticism (see Ideas 2240 and 2241), and voted only for 'mitigated scepticism' (see Idea 2242). On the other hand, there is no greater opposition in philosophy than Kant and Hume on 'pure reason'.
|
3575
|
Scepticism can involve discrepancy, relativity, infinity, assumption and circularity
[Williams,M]
|
|
Full Idea:
The classical Five Modes of Scepticism are Discrepancy (people always disagree), Relativity ('according to you'), Infinity (infinite regress of questions), Assumption (ending in dogma) and Circularity (end up where you started).
|
|
From:
Michael Williams (Problems of Knowledge [2001], Ch. 5)
|
|
A reaction:
I take Relativity to be different from scepticism (because, roughly, it says there is nothing to know), and the others go with Agrippa's Trilemma of justification, which may have solutions.
|
7322
|
Constitutive scepticism is about facts, and epistemological scepticism about our ability to know them
[Miller,A]
|
|
Full Idea:
We should distinguish 'constitutive scepticism' (about the existence of certain sorts of facts) from the traditional 'epistemological scepticism' (which concedes that the sort of fact in question exists, but questions our right to claim knowledge of it).
|
|
From:
Alexander Miller (Philosophy of Language [1998], 4.7)
|
|
A reaction:
I would be inclined to call the first type 'ontological scepticism'. Miller is discussing Quine's scepticism about meaning. Atheists fall into the first group, and agnostics into the second. An important, and nicely simple, distinction.
|
6588
|
Scepticism is cartesian (sceptical scenarios), or Humean (future), or Pyrrhonian (suspend belief)
[Fogelin]
|
|
Full Idea:
The three forms of scepticism are cartesian, Humean and Pyrrhonian. The first challenges belief by inventing sceptical scenarios; the second doubts the future; the third aims to suspend belief.
|
|
From:
Robert Fogelin (Walking the Tightrope of Reason [2003], Ch.4)
|
|
A reaction:
A standard distinction is made between methodological and global scepticism. The former seems to be Cartesian, and the latter Pyrrhonian. The interest here is see Hume placed in a distinctive category, because of his views on induction.
|