structure for 'Social Practice'    |     alphabetical list of themes    |     unexpand these ideas

25. Social Practice / A. Freedoms / 1. Slavery

[allowing workers to be unpaid and owned by others]

29 ideas
Aristotle thought slavery is just if it is both necessary and natural [Aristotle, by Sandel]
     Full Idea: For slavery to be just, according to Aristotle, two conditions must be met: it must be necessary, and it must be natural.
     From: report of Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics [c.334 BCE]) by Michael J. Sandel - Justice: What's the right thing to do? 08
     A reaction: Aristotle thought it met both conditions, but no one now thinks it meets either condition.
Natural slaves are those naturally belonging to another, or who can manage no more than labouring [Aristotle]
     Full Idea: A human being who belongs, by nature, not to himself but to another is, by nature, a slave. ...Those whose function happens to be the use of their bodies (when this is the best that can be achieved) are slaves by nature.
     From: Aristotle (Politics [c.332 BCE], 1254a09-), quoted by Armand Marie LeRoi - The Lagoon: how Aristotle invented science 099
     A reaction: A nice example of Aristotle trying to derive what ought to be from the 'nature' of each thing. Clearly, though, this was not the best that can be achieved. And why are labourers slaves, but not computer programmers or economists?
Slavery is a disgraceful crime [Spinoza]
     Full Idea: Slavery is a disgraceful crime.
     From: Baruch de Spinoza (The Ethics [1675], IVApp 21)
     A reaction: Note the date of this - when the slave trade is just getting going, and long before it is threatened or criticised.
Slavery is not just obedience, but acting only in the interests of the master [Spinoza]
     Full Idea: It is not acting on command in itself that makes someone a slave, but rather the reason for so acting. ...A slave is someone obliged to obey commands from a master which look only to the advantage of the master.
     From: Baruch de Spinoza (Tractatus Theologico-Politicus [1670], 16.10)
     A reaction: So if I forcibly enslaved you, and then only commanded things which were for your own good, that would not be slavery? If the master feeds the slave, is that not part of the slavery? Most jobs might count as slavery by this account?
If you try to enslave me, you have declared war on me [Locke]
     Full Idea: He who makes an attempt to enslave me thereby puts himself into a state of war with me.
     From: John Locke (Second Treatise of Government [1690], 017)
     A reaction: So presumably actual slaves are in a state of permanent war with their owners. What of a woman who is enslaved by her husband?
Slaves captured in a just war have no right to property, so are not part of civil society [Locke]
     Full Idea: Slave are captives taken in a just war, and by right of Nature subjected to the absolute dominion and arbitrary power of their masters. ...Being not capable of any property, they cannot in that state be considered any part of civil society.
     From: John Locke (Second Treatise of Government [1690], 085)
     A reaction: If the test of citizenship is being capable of holding property, presumably children and mentally damaged people (including the very old) will also fail to qualify. I see no principled reason why slaves should not be allowed to vote. Note 'just' war.
A master forfeits ownership of slaves he abandons [Locke]
     Full Idea: A master forfeits the dominion over his slaves whom he hath abandoned.
     From: John Locke (Second Treatise of Government [1690], 237)
     A reaction: How often did slave owners take a day off, I wonder? Presumably slaves will take back their freedom, even if the masters haven't 'forfeited' their ownership, so Locke's point is fairly academic.
Slavery is entirely bad; the master abandons the virtues, and they are pointless in the slave [Montesquieu]
     Full Idea: There is nothing good about the nature of slavery. The slave can achieve nothing by being virtuous. The master acquires all sorts of bad habits, and is accustomed to behaving with a total lack of moral virtues.
     From: Baron de Montesquieu (The Spirit of the Laws (rev. 1757) [1748], 15.01)
     A reaction: Most slavery of that time took place in colonies, far remote from the moral judgments of the mother country. The temptations of such power over others are far too great for most masters to live virtuously.
Slaves are not members of the society, so no law can forbid them to run away [Montesquieu]
     Full Idea: What civil law could prevent a slave from running away? Since he is not a member of society, why should the laws of society concern him?
     From: Baron de Montesquieu (The Spirit of the Laws (rev. 1757) [1748], 15.02)
     A reaction: Hm. Does this apply to children, who can't vote or stand for office?
The demand for slavery is just the masters' demand for luxury [Montesquieu]
     Full Idea: The demand for slavery is the demand for luxury and voluptuousness; it has nothing to do with concern for public felicity.
     From: Baron de Montesquieu (The Spirit of the Laws (rev. 1757) [1748], 15.09)
     A reaction: True monarchists and aristocratic elitists presumably think that a society should have one part which lives in great luxury. Where else are the fine arts and wonderful buildings going to come from?
People must be made dependent before they can be enslaved [Rousseau]
     Full Idea: It is impossible to enslave a man without having first put him in the position of being incapable of doing without another.
     From: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Discourse on the Origin of Inequality [1754], Part I)
     A reaction: Ah yes. The key to running a slave plantation is not the threat of violence, but control of the shelter and food supply.
Enslaved peoples often boast of their condition, calling it a state of 'peace' [Rousseau]
     Full Idea: Enslaved peoples do nothing but boast of the peace and tranquillity they enjoy in their chains and they give the name 'peace' to the most miserable slavery.
     From: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Discourse on the Origin of Inequality [1754], Part II)
     A reaction: It seems to be a sad truth that enslaved peoples are less upset about their condition than outside observers are, especially in modern times, where slavery is usually deemed unacceptable. Slavery might be the best you can hope for.
If the child of a slave woman is born a slave, then a man is not born a man [Rousseau]
     Full Idea: The jurists who have gravely pronounced that the child of a slave woman is born a slave, have decided, in other words, that a man is not born a man.
     From: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Discourse on the Origin of Inequality [1754], Part II)
     A reaction: The hidden premise of this enthymeme is that man is born free. A key issue of liberalism is the status of children. Are the children of religious believers automatically members of that sect? Can I be born a West Ham supporter?
Sometimes full liberty is only possible at the expense of some complete enslavement [Rousseau]
     Full Idea: There are some unfortunate circumstances where one's liberty can be preserved only at the expense of someone else's, and where the citizen can be perfectly free only if the slave is completely enslaved. Such was the situation in Sparta.
     From: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (The Social Contract (tr Cress) [1762], III.15)
     A reaction: Rousseau wrote just before the moment when it was seen that slavery in European empires might be abolished, but he was not in the forefront of thought on this one. Greek philosophy would probably never have happened without slavery.
We can never assume that the son of a slave is a slave [Rousseau]
     Full Idea: To decide that the son of a slave is born a slave is to decide that he is not a man.
     From: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (The Social Contract (tr Cress) [1762], IV.2)
     A reaction: Obviously this is because men are 'born free', though I am not clear how that maxim can be reached. I take it for granted that African slaves in the Americas found themselves born into slavery. No justification was required.
State slavery is a phase of education, moving towards a full culture [Hegel]
     Full Idea: Because slavery exists in states, it is a phase of advance from the merely isolated sensual existence - a phase of education - a mode of becoming participant in a higher morality and the culture connected with it.
     From: Georg W.F.Hegel (The Philosophy of History [1840], p.98), quoted by Stephen Houlgate - An Introduction to Hegel 08 'Rights'
     A reaction: [He adds that slavery should be removed slowly, not suddenly] A nicely provocative thought. Is it better to participate in something grand (like pyramid building) as a slave, or drift in dull isolation? How long should this 'phase' last?
Slavery is unjust, because humanity is essentially free [Hegel]
     Full Idea: Slavery is in and for itself an injustice, for the essence of humanity is freedom.
     From: Georg W.F.Hegel (The Philosophy of History [1840], p.99), quoted by Stephen Houlgate - An Introduction to Hegel 08 'Rights'
     A reaction: This is a corrective to Idea 12783, which offers a defence of the reality of historical slavery. That seemed to depend on some notion that each phase of history is necessary, which is implausible.
Slaves are partly responsible for their own condition [Hegel]
     Full Idea: If someone is a slave, his own will is responsible. The wrong of slavery is not only the fault of those who enslave people, but of the slaves themselves. …[66 add: The slave has an absolute right to free himself]
     From: Georg W.F.Hegel (Elements of the Philosophy of Right [1821], 057 add)
     A reaction: He accepts that enslaving people is wrong. Are the slaves at fault for losing their struggle? Would Hegel approve of someone giving modern weapons to the slaves?
Slaves have no duties because they have no rights [Hegel]
     Full Idea: Slaves have no duties because they have no rights.
     From: Georg W.F.Hegel (Elements of the Philosophy of Right [1821], 261), quoted by Stephen Houlgate - An Introduction to Hegel 08 'Freedom'
     A reaction: Does this correlation go all the way up society? Do I only have duties insofar as I have correlative rights? Monarchs seem to have maximum duties and maximum rights. Democratic leaders seem thereby to get a raw deal.
Poverty and slavery are virtually two words for the same thing [Schopenhauer]
     Full Idea: Poverty and slavery are only two forms - on might almost say two words for - the same thing, the essence of which is that a man's energies are expended for the most part not on his own behalf but on that of others.
     From: Arthur Schopenhauer (Parerga and Paralipomena [1851], IX:125)
     A reaction: The modern world is full of people who righteously despise slavery, but think only of the poor that it serves them right.
Slavery cannot be abolished without the steam-engine [Marx/Engels]
     Full Idea: Slavery cannot be abolished without the steam-engine.
     From: K Marx / F Engels (The German Ideology [1846], §1.B)
     A reaction: In Britain and its colonies it does appear that the rise of factories and the abolition of slavery coincided. It is hard to see why this should be a necessity, though. Did the early Christians keep slaves? Some ancient Greeks objected to slavery.
Slavery undermines the morals and energy of a society [Tocqueville]
     Full Idea: Slavery dishonours labour; it introduces idleness into society, and with idleness, ignorance and pride, luxury and distress.
     From: Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America (abr Renshaw) [1840], 1.01)
     A reaction: A pretty feeble reason (in the 1830s) for disliking slavery. He seems only concerned with the adverse effects on the slave-owning society, and shows no interest in the slaves themselves.
There is always slavery, whether we like it or not [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: In truth there is always slavery - whether you want it or not; e.g. Prussian officials. Scholars. Monks.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Unpublished Notebooks 1884-85 [1884], 25[225])
     A reaction: Not very persuasive examples. Monks are free to join and to leave. Maybe a lot of marriages are close to slavery for one side (usually the woman). Strict slavery has almost ceased in western civilisation (I think!). Nietzsche saw 'the herd' as slaves.
Slavery cannot be judged by our standards, because the sense of justice was then less developed [Nietzsche]
     Full Idea: The injustice of slavery, the cruelty in subjugating persons and peoples, cannot be measured by our standards. For the instinct for justice was not so widely developed then.
     From: Friedrich Nietzsche (Human, All Too Human [1878], 101)
     A reaction: Why do we value the instinct for justic which we have subsequently developed? Why do we think it is important, and battle to preserve it? This is the sort of creepy relativism that Nietzsche drifted into, and for the worse.
Slavery began the divorce between the work and the purposes of the worker [Russell]
     Full Idea: The introduction of slavery began the divorce between the purpose of the work and the purposes of the worker.
     From: Bertrand Russell (Authority and the Individual [1949], 4)
     A reaction: Worth saying, because marxists tend to blame more recent capitalism for creating this problem (of 'alienation'). There are many degrees of slavery.
If effort is from necessity rather than for a good, it is slavery [Weil]
     Full Idea: To strive from necessity and not for some good - ...that is always slavery.
     From: Simone Weil (Gravity and Grace (9 extracts) [1943], p.180)
     A reaction: It is usual to see the possibility of anarchism as the starting point for political thinking, but I think for Weil the state of slavery has that role.
The pleasure of completing tasks motivates just as well as the whip of slavery [Weil]
     Full Idea: The sight of the unfinished task attracts the free man as powerfully as the over-seer's whip stimulates the slave.
     From: Simone Weil (Reflections on Liberty and Social Oppression [1934], p.94)
     A reaction: This is Weil's key social idea - that freely performed productive work can be, and should be, a joy, as long as it is accompanied by respect and friendship, rather than oppression. Did this idea ever occur to a slave owner?
The Pharisees undermined slavery, by giving slaves responsibility and status in law courts [Johnson,P]
     Full Idea: It is no accident that slavery among Jews disappeared with the rise of the Pharisees, as they insisted that all were equal before God in a court. Masters were no longer responsible for actions of slaves, so a slave had status, and slavery could not work.
     From: Paul Johnson (The History of the Jews [1987], Pt II)
     A reaction: As in seventeenth century England, the rise of social freedom comes from religious sources, not social sources. A slave has status in the transcendent world of souls, despite being a nobody in the physical world.
If everyone owned himself, that would prevent slavery [Kymlicka]
     Full Idea: The best way to prevent enslavement of one person to another is to give each person ownership over himself.
     From: Will Kymlicka (Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn) [1990], 4.2.c)
     A reaction: [The idea comes from Nozick, but Kymlicka is assessing how it should be understood] The best way to block any social evil like slavery is to make it unthinkable. Legislation is second best. Presumably I could sell myself into slavery (like Faust)?