7651
|
With wonderful new machines being made, a speaking machine no longer seems impossible
[La Mettrie]
|
|
Full Idea:
If wonderful machines like Huygens's planetary clock can be made, it would take even more cogs and springs to make a speaking machine, which can no longer be considered impossible, particularly at the hands of a new Prometheus.
|
|
From:
Julien Offray de La Mettrie (Machine Man [1747], p.34)
|
|
A reaction:
Compare Descartes in Idea 3614. The idea of artificial intelligence does not arise with the advent of computers; it follows naturally from the materialist view of the mind, along with a bit of ambition to build complex machines.
|
3135
|
Is thought a syntactic computation using representations?
[Fodor, by Rey]
|
|
Full Idea:
The modest mentalism of the Computational/Representational Theory of Thought (CRTT), associated with Fodor, says mental processes are computational, defined over syntactically specified entities, and these entities represent the world (are also semantic).
|
|
From:
report of Jerry A. Fodor (works [1986]) by Georges Rey - Contemporary Philosophy of Mind Int.3
|
|
A reaction:
This seems to imply that if you built a machine that did all these things, it would become conscious, which sounds unlikely. Do footprints 'represent' feet, or does representation need prior consciousness?
|
3215
|
Images can't replace computation, as they need it
[Rey]
|
|
Full Idea:
Processing of images and mental models seems to require, and therefore is unlikely to replace, computation and representation.
|
|
From:
Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 10.1.2)
|
|
A reaction:
A good point. If you are a fan of mental imagery, you still have to explain how we can hold an image, or recall it, or manipulate it. I always, I don't know why, wince at the thought of 'computations' among neurons.
|
3194
|
CRTT is good on deduction, but not so hot on induction, abduction and practical reason
[Rey]
|
|
Full Idea:
The computational/representational theory of thought has given a good account of deduction, but mechanical theories of induction, abduction and practical reason are needed in order to make a machine which could reason.
|
|
From:
Georges Rey (Contemporary Philosophy of Mind [1997], 8.5)
|
|
A reaction:
This is the best analysis of rationality that I have found (four components: deduction, induction, abduction, practical reason). I can think of nothing to add, and certainly none of these should be omitted.
|
6655
|
The 'Frame Problem' is how to program the appropriate application of general knowledge
[Lowe]
|
|
Full Idea:
The 'Frame Problem' in artificial intelligence is how to write a program which not only embodies people's general knowledge, but specifies how that knowledge is to be applied appropriately, when circumstances can't be specified in advance.
|
|
From:
E.J. Lowe (Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind [2000], Ch. 8)
|
|
A reaction:
As Lowe observes, this is a problem, but not necessarily an impossibility. There should be a way to symbolically map the concepts of knowledge onto the concepts of perception, just as we must do.
|